<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 122 - GSTAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802262</link>
    <description>Transporting goods without updated vehicle particulars in Part B of an e-way bill or under an expired e-way bill, without a valid reason, is a substantive contravention attracting penalty under Section 129. The registered person&#039;s compliance duty is non-delegable, and transporter negligence does not excuse non-compliance. Matching invoices and subsequent return declarations do not cure the contravention at interception or justify waiver of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 18:19:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 122 - GSTAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802262</link>
      <description>Transporting goods without updated vehicle particulars in Part B of an e-way bill or under an expired e-way bill, without a valid reason, is a substantive contravention attracting penalty under Section 129. The registered person&#039;s compliance duty is non-delegable, and transporter negligence does not excuse non-compliance. Matching invoices and subsequent return declarations do not cure the contravention at interception or justify waiver of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>