<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 57 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802197</link>
    <description>Proportionate reversal of CENVAT credit under Rule 6 is treated as non-availment, and the rule gives the assessee an option. Where remand directions require verification of the amount reversed, reapplying the rule without verification is contrary to judicial discipline. Regular filing of declarations and returns, together with audit, is relevant to applying the extended limitation period to concessional-duty demands. Where extended limitation does not apply, demands are confined to the normal period, with cum-duty benefit for surviving demands. The absence of an allegation or evidence of mens rea is relevant to penalties on a manufacturer and its director.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 09:23:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 57 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802197</link>
      <description>Proportionate reversal of CENVAT credit under Rule 6 is treated as non-availment, and the rule gives the assessee an option. Where remand directions require verification of the amount reversed, reapplying the rule without verification is contrary to judicial discipline. Regular filing of declarations and returns, together with audit, is relevant to applying the extended limitation period to concessional-duty demands. Where extended limitation does not apply, demands are confined to the normal period, with cum-duty benefit for surviving demands. The absence of an allegation or evidence of mens rea is relevant to penalties on a manufacturer and its director.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>