<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 115 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802255</link>
    <description>The omission of Rule 96(10) without a saving or sunset clause means proceedings under its export refund restriction cannot continue. A CBIC clarification treats the omission as effective retrospectively from 23 October 2017, and binding Supreme Court precedent addresses the effect of such omissions on pending proceedings. The affected export refund is to be processed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 09:23:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 115 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802255</link>
      <description>The omission of Rule 96(10) without a saving or sunset clause means proceedings under its export refund restriction cannot continue. A CBIC clarification treats the omission as effective retrospectively from 23 October 2017, and binding Supreme Court precedent addresses the effect of such omissions on pending proceedings. The affected export refund is to be processed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>