<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 117 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802257</link>
    <description>The question whether the omission of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 applies to proceedings pending on the date of omission was not independently adjudicated by the Supreme Court when it dismissed the special leave petition. The dismissal therefore did not determine the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 09:23:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 117 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802257</link>
      <description>The question whether the omission of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 applies to proceedings pending on the date of omission was not independently adjudicated by the Supreme Court when it dismissed the special leave petition. The dismissal therefore did not determine the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>