<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 197 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54841</link>
    <description>POY produced on bobbins of one kilogram or less was found to have been cut off and treated as waste, not clandestinely cleared as yarn. Contemporaneous correspondence with excise authorities, the classification order treating manufacturing waste as waste, RG-1 and stock verification records, and field officers&#039; references to waste yarn supported the assessee&#039;s explanation. As there was no evidence of sale or removal of the goods as yarn, the absence of separate category-wise accounting did not justify an inference of unaccounted clearance. The demand of duty and the penalty were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:50:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 197 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54841</link>
      <description>POY produced on bobbins of one kilogram or less was found to have been cut off and treated as waste, not clandestinely cleared as yarn. Contemporaneous correspondence with excise authorities, the classification order treating manufacturing waste as waste, RG-1 and stock verification records, and field officers&#039; references to waste yarn supported the assessee&#039;s explanation. As there was no evidence of sale or removal of the goods as yarn, the absence of separate category-wise accounting did not justify an inference of unaccounted clearance. The demand of duty and the penalty were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>