<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2421 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=473032</link>
    <description>Revision under section 263 requires an assessment to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. Where the assessing officer has made specific and follow-up inquiries into unsecured loans and considered lender creditworthiness, bank records and repayment, disagreement over the extent of inquiry or a permissible assessment view does not by itself justify revision. Without valid revisional jurisdiction, the assessment remains undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 18:59:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2421 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=473032</link>
      <description>Revision under section 263 requires an assessment to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. Where the assessing officer has made specific and follow-up inquiries into unsecured loans and considered lender creditworthiness, bank records and repayment, disagreement over the extent of inquiry or a permissible assessment view does not by itself justify revision. Without valid revisional jurisdiction, the assessment remains undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=473032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>