<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 12 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802152</link>
    <description>Written acceptance of customs reassessment under Section 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962 dispenses only with the requirement of a speaking order; it does not bar a statutory challenge to the formation of opinion or the merits of reassessment. Under Section 14 of the Act and Rule 12(2) of the customs valuation rules, the officer must communicate grounds establishing reasonable doubt about the truth or accuracy of a declared transaction value before rejecting it. Subsequent valuation must follow the prescribed sequential methods. NIDB or contemporaneous-import data alone cannot justify enhancement without independent cogent material demonstrating comparability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 08:31:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 12 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802152</link>
      <description>Written acceptance of customs reassessment under Section 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962 dispenses only with the requirement of a speaking order; it does not bar a statutory challenge to the formation of opinion or the merits of reassessment. Under Section 14 of the Act and Rule 12(2) of the customs valuation rules, the officer must communicate grounds establishing reasonable doubt about the truth or accuracy of a declared transaction value before rejecting it. Subsequent valuation must follow the prescribed sequential methods. NIDB or contemporaneous-import data alone cannot justify enhancement without independent cogent material demonstrating comparability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>