<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (11) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802186</link>
    <description>Delayed filing of the annual return in Form GSTR-9 attracts a late fee under Section 47. A separate general penalty under Section 125 is not warranted for the same delay because that provision applies only where no other penalty is provided for the contravention. The specific late-fee mechanism covers the filing default, so the late fee remains payable but the separate general penalty is invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 08:31:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=933006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (11) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802186</link>
      <description>Delayed filing of the annual return in Form GSTR-9 attracts a late fee under Section 47. A separate general penalty under Section 125 is not warranted for the same delay because that provision applies only where no other penalty is provided for the contravention. The specific late-fee mechanism covers the filing default, so the late fee remains payable but the separate general penalty is invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=802186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>