https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54815 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that calcined China clay should be classified under Heading 25.05, attracting a nil rate of duty due to exemption notifications. The tribunal found no intent to evade duty through misclassification, setting aside duty demands and penalties under Section 11A, and allowing the appeal. en-us Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Apr 2024 10:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54815 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that calcined China clay should be classified under Heading 25.05, attracting a nil rate of duty due to exemption notifications. The tribunal found no intent to evade duty through misclassification, setting aside duty demands and penalties under Section 11A, and allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54815