<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 165 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54814</link>
    <description>Segregation of insulation and metal from imported cable scrap was treated as &quot;jobbing&quot; for exemption under Notification No. 32/97-Cus. read with the Customs (IDCRDMEG) Rules, 1996. The notification covered duty-free import for execution of an export order by jobbing, provided the prescribed procedure was followed and the imported goods and resultant products were re-exported. &quot;Jobbing&quot; was not confined to a process ending in a complete manufactured article; undertaking part of the processing was sufficient. Where the importer separated the outer insulation from the metallic portion and re-exported the resulting material in compliance with the Rules, the exemption was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:29:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 165 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54814</link>
      <description>Segregation of insulation and metal from imported cable scrap was treated as &quot;jobbing&quot; for exemption under Notification No. 32/97-Cus. read with the Customs (IDCRDMEG) Rules, 1996. The notification covered duty-free import for execution of an export order by jobbing, provided the prescribed procedure was followed and the imported goods and resultant products were re-exported. &quot;Jobbing&quot; was not confined to a process ending in a complete manufactured article; undertaking part of the processing was sufficient. Where the importer separated the outer insulation from the metallic portion and re-exported the resulting material in compliance with the Rules, the exemption was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>