<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 163 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54811</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the importer need not own the factory where imported goods are utilized. It emphasized that denying registration based on factory ownership contradicts policy and legal interpretations. The focus should be on the utilization of imported goods, aligning with global trade practices and liberalization principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 163 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54811</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the importer need not own the factory where imported goods are utilized. It emphasized that denying registration based on factory ownership contradicts policy and legal interpretations. The focus should be on the utilization of imported goods, aligning with global trade practices and liberalization principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>