https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54806 The tribunal ruled in favor of the revenue department, determining that the loose stock of goods reflected in the RG-1 register should be treated as finished goods for duty liability purposes. The tribunal found that the goods were indeed finished and not under processing, as claimed by the respondents. As a result, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous order and imposing duty liability at the rate prevailing before the introduction of the compounded levy scheme. en-us Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:16:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54806 The tribunal ruled in favor of the revenue department, determining that the loose stock of goods reflected in the RG-1 register should be treated as finished goods for duty liability purposes. The tribunal found that the goods were indeed finished and not under processing, as claimed by the respondents. As a result, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous order and imposing duty liability at the rate prevailing before the introduction of the compounded levy scheme. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54806