<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 169 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54797</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of confiscation, denial of drawback, and imposition of penalty, acknowledging the misdeclaration by the appellant. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs, considering the potential drawback benefit. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurate declaration in Shipping Bills and adherence to market value for drawback claims, citing legal principles governing such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:04:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 169 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54797</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of confiscation, denial of drawback, and imposition of penalty, acknowledging the misdeclaration by the appellant. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs, considering the potential drawback benefit. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurate declaration in Shipping Bills and adherence to market value for drawback claims, citing legal principles governing such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>