<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment beyond four years stands where fresh material indicates incomplete disclosure and no prior opinion was formed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105608</link>
    <description>Reassessment beyond four years after a completed scrutiny assessment requires recorded reasons based on tangible material with a live link to escaped income and a failure of full and true disclosure of material facts. A post-assessment investigation concerning alleged share overvaluation, underlying assets, use of sale proceeds and capital-gains deduction supplied a prima facie basis for reopening. Change of opinion applies only where the original proceeding consciously formed an opinion; an intimation under Section 143(1) is not an assessment, and no prior view on the relevant valuation or deduction issues was formed under Section 143(3). The reassessment notices were therefore valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 09:44:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 09:44:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment beyond four years stands where fresh material indicates incomplete disclosure and no prior opinion was formed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105608</link>
      <description>Reassessment beyond four years after a completed scrutiny assessment requires recorded reasons based on tangible material with a live link to escaped income and a failure of full and true disclosure of material facts. A post-assessment investigation concerning alleged share overvaluation, underlying assets, use of sale proceeds and capital-gains deduction supplied a prima facie basis for reopening. Change of opinion applies only where the original proceeding consciously formed an opinion; an intimation under Section 143(1) is not an assessment, and no prior view on the relevant valuation or deduction issues was formed under Section 143(3). The reassessment notices were therefore valid.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 09:44:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>