<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Misreported SEZ export deductions can trigger under-reporting penalties despite unchanged deemed income, no revenue loss, or alleged bona fide intent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105602</link>
    <description>Section 270A distinguishes ordinary under-reporting from under-reporting resulting from misreporting; a notice expressly alleging the latter need not identify a further sub-category. Claiming the full SEZ export-profit deduction where only half is eligible, coupled with inconsistent Forms 56F and correction only after scrutiny, can negate a bona fide explanation and constitute misreporting. Under-reporting under normal provisions is assessed by comparing assessed income with income processed on the return, so unchanged deemed income under section 115JC does not eliminate penalty exposure. Processing under section 143(1)(a) remains mandatory under the amended regime despite a scrutiny notice. Penalty may apply despite no revenue loss or demonstrated intent to evade tax, with required faceless approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 09:42:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 09:42:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Misreported SEZ export deductions can trigger under-reporting penalties despite unchanged deemed income, no revenue loss, or alleged bona fide intent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105602</link>
      <description>Section 270A distinguishes ordinary under-reporting from under-reporting resulting from misreporting; a notice expressly alleging the latter need not identify a further sub-category. Claiming the full SEZ export-profit deduction where only half is eligible, coupled with inconsistent Forms 56F and correction only after scrutiny, can negate a bona fide explanation and constitute misreporting. Under-reporting under normal provisions is assessed by comparing assessed income with income processed on the return, so unchanged deemed income under section 115JC does not eliminate penalty exposure. Processing under section 143(1)(a) remains mandatory under the amended regime despite a scrutiny notice. Penalty may apply despite no revenue loss or demonstrated intent to evade tax, with required faceless approval.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 09:42:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>