<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 158 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the refund claim for the differential duty between free sale and levy sugar rates. It held that duty is determined at the time of clearance, and since the duty burden was on the appellants, they were entitled to the refund. The decision emphasized the importance of clarity in duty payment regulations and the responsibility for duty payment in cases of sugar clearance under different classifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:41:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 158 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the refund claim for the differential duty between free sale and levy sugar rates. It held that duty is determined at the time of clearance, and since the duty burden was on the appellants, they were entitled to the refund. The decision emphasized the importance of clarity in duty payment regulations and the responsibility for duty payment in cases of sugar clearance under different classifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>