<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 157 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and granting consequential reliefs to the appellants. The Boric Acid was classified under Heading 28.10 instead of 38.08, emphasizing the importance of accurate classification based on specific descriptions and proper consideration of all relevant factors in customs disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:39:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 157 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and granting consequential reliefs to the appellants. The Boric Acid was classified under Heading 28.10 instead of 38.08, emphasizing the importance of accurate classification based on specific descriptions and proper consideration of all relevant factors in customs disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>