https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54789 The Tribunal found a delay in listing Department appeals, leading to separate adjudications and inconsistent fines. Appeals by both parties were to be heard together based on precedent. The Tribunal directed a reassessment of fines and penalties for consignments, emphasizing proper valuation. All appeals against adjudication orders should have been listed simultaneously. The impugned orders were set aside, and cases remanded for re-adjudication with cooperation from respondents. An investigation was ordered to assign responsibility for the failure to list all appeals together promptly. en-us Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:38:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54789 The Tribunal found a delay in listing Department appeals, leading to separate adjudications and inconsistent fines. Appeals by both parties were to be heard together based on precedent. The Tribunal directed a reassessment of fines and penalties for consignments, emphasizing proper valuation. All appeals against adjudication orders should have been listed simultaneously. The impugned orders were set aside, and cases remanded for re-adjudication with cooperation from respondents. An investigation was ordered to assign responsibility for the failure to list all appeals together promptly. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54789