<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 154 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54781</link>
    <description>The duty demands on steel structures fabricated as job work were set aside as they were raised beyond the permissible period of limitation. The appeals were allowed due to the lack of wilful actions with intent to evade payment of duty and the absence of dutiability for a significant part of the period in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:27:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 154 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54781</link>
      <description>The duty demands on steel structures fabricated as job work were set aside as they were raised beyond the permissible period of limitation. The appeals were allowed due to the lack of wilful actions with intent to evade payment of duty and the absence of dutiability for a significant part of the period in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>