<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1865 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801922</link>
    <description>Service-tax proceedings concerned reliance on third-party information shared between tax authorities, the duty to self-assess, principles of natural justice, negative-list and exemption coverage, and limitation. Original and appellate orders were set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration from the show-cause-notice stage in accordance with law. The writ petition was treated as covered by an earlier decision concerning these issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1865 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801922</link>
      <description>Service-tax proceedings concerned reliance on third-party information shared between tax authorities, the duty to self-assess, principles of natural justice, negative-list and exemption coverage, and limitation. Original and appellate orders were set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration from the show-cause-notice stage in accordance with law. The writ petition was treated as covered by an earlier decision concerning these issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>