<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1867 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801924</link>
    <description>Arrest under Section 19(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires recorded reasons to believe, based on material in the authorised officer&#039;s possession, that the person is guilty. Where the statutory examination process under Section 50 has been invoked to confront a person with existing material, arrest on that same material requires completion of that process or fresh incriminating material or a supervening exigency. Omitting the prior examination permission and failing to establish a fresh necessity renders the arrest and consequential remand legally unsustainable; a remand order must address the related objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1867 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801924</link>
      <description>Arrest under Section 19(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires recorded reasons to believe, based on material in the authorised officer&#039;s possession, that the person is guilty. Where the statutory examination process under Section 50 has been invoked to confront a person with existing material, arrest on that same material requires completion of that process or fresh incriminating material or a supervening exigency. Omitting the prior examination permission and failing to establish a fresh necessity renders the arrest and consequential remand legally unsustainable; a remand order must address the related objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>