<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1878 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801935</link>
    <description>Wrongful withholding under section 452 of the Companies Act was alleged against a director who contended that continued directorship precluded the offence. The challenge also asserted non-application of mind in framing notice and breach of natural justice. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, finding no ground to interfere with the High Court order, leaving the notice order and pending proceedings undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:33:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1878 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801935</link>
      <description>Wrongful withholding under section 452 of the Companies Act was alleged against a director who contended that continued directorship precluded the offence. The challenge also asserted non-application of mind in framing notice and breach of natural justice. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, finding no ground to interfere with the High Court order, leaving the notice order and pending proceedings undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>