<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1934 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801991</link>
    <description>Delayed GST return filing attracts late fee as the specified consequence. A general penalty under Section 125 of the relevant GST enactments applies only where no other penalty is prescribed for the default. Where late fee has been levied for delayed return filing, imposing an additional general penalty for the same default is unsustainable. The general penalty was therefore set aside, while the liability to pay late fee remained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:33:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1934 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801991</link>
      <description>Delayed GST return filing attracts late fee as the specified consequence. A general penalty under Section 125 of the relevant GST enactments applies only where no other penalty is prescribed for the default. Where late fee has been levied for delayed return filing, imposing an additional general penalty for the same default is unsustainable. The general penalty was therefore set aside, while the liability to pay late fee remained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>