<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1941 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801998</link>
    <description>Section 107 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act requires an appellate authority to consider grounds pleaded for condoning delayed appeals before rejecting them as time-barred. Where inadequate advice and an accountant&#039;s failure to communicate are specifically advanced as reasons for delay, reliance on limitation alone without addressing those grounds is unsustainable. The delay was condoned, and the statutory appeal was restored for adjudication on merits, subject to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:33:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1941 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801998</link>
      <description>Section 107 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act requires an appellate authority to consider grounds pleaded for condoning delayed appeals before rejecting them as time-barred. Where inadequate advice and an accountant&#039;s failure to communicate are specifically advanced as reasons for delay, reliance on limitation alone without addressing those grounds is unsustainable. The delay was condoned, and the statutory appeal was restored for adjudication on merits, subject to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>