<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supply of relied-upon PMLA documents requires fair-trial safeguards, while blanket Investigating Officer attendance needs specific procedural justification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105525</link>
    <description>Supply of relied-upon documents in PMLA complaint proceedings engages the trial court&#039;s fair-trial obligation to provide complaint materials to the accused. Whether the best available copies were furnished or documents are unavailable remains for determination on the trial-court record; inherent jurisdiction should not pre-empt that factual determination absent patent illegality or lack of jurisdiction. Observations made to secure compliance with document-supply timelines do not determine the integrity of the investigating agency or officer and should not affect other proceedings. Investigating Officer attendance may be required when necessary, including through video-conferencing, but not automatically on every hearing date; each direction should specify its purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:33:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:33:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supply of relied-upon PMLA documents requires fair-trial safeguards, while blanket Investigating Officer attendance needs specific procedural justification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105525</link>
      <description>Supply of relied-upon documents in PMLA complaint proceedings engages the trial court&#039;s fair-trial obligation to provide complaint materials to the accused. Whether the best available copies were furnished or documents are unavailable remains for determination on the trial-court record; inherent jurisdiction should not pre-empt that factual determination absent patent illegality or lack of jurisdiction. Observations made to secure compliance with document-supply timelines do not determine the integrity of the investigating agency or officer and should not affect other proceedings. Investigating Officer attendance may be required when necessary, including through video-conferencing, but not automatically on every hearing date; each direction should specify its purpose.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:33:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>