https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54757 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order alleging clandestine removal of goods due to insufficient concrete evidence. Emphasizing the necessity of tangible proof, the Tribunal found the evidence presented lacking in specificity, failing to establish the charge beyond doubt. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal granted the appeal in favor of the appellant company, highlighting the importance of substantial evidence in proving charges of clandestine removal conclusively. en-us Mon, 05 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:44:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54757 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order alleging clandestine removal of goods due to insufficient concrete evidence. Emphasizing the necessity of tangible proof, the Tribunal found the evidence presented lacking in specificity, failing to establish the charge beyond doubt. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal granted the appeal in favor of the appellant company, highlighting the importance of substantial evidence in proving charges of clandestine removal conclusively. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54757