<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1783 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801840</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, including the statutory twin bail conditions and the necessity of custodial interrogation, was in issue. The Supreme Court did not determine those bail issues on their merits, finding no good reason to entertain the Special Leave Petition after an inordinate delay of 480 days. The petition was consequently dismissed solely on the ground of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 07:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1783 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801840</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, including the statutory twin bail conditions and the necessity of custodial interrogation, was in issue. The Supreme Court did not determine those bail issues on their merits, finding no good reason to entertain the Special Leave Petition after an inordinate delay of 480 days. The petition was consequently dismissed solely on the ground of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>