https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801890 Penalty imposed under Section 270A of the Income-tax Act and the consequential demand notice under Section 156 were challenged through writ jurisdiction under Article 226. An equivalent penalty order and consequential demand notice had already been quashed in a coordinate-bench decision. As the applicability of that decision was undisputed, the penalty order and consequential demand notice for the relevant assessment year were quashed in favour of the assessee. en-us Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Oct 2026 07:16:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801890 Penalty imposed under Section 270A of the Income-tax Act and the consequential demand notice under Section 156 were challenged through writ jurisdiction under Article 226. An equivalent penalty order and consequential demand notice had already been quashed in a coordinate-bench decision. As the applicability of that decision was undisputed, the penalty order and consequential demand notice for the relevant assessment year were quashed in favour of the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801890