https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54739 The Tribunal held that the appellants were not entitled to exemption under Notification No. 108/95-C.E. due to the proviso to Section 5A of the Central Excise Act. However, the duty was calculated as per Notification No. 84/97-Cus., resulting in nil duty for goods supplied to projects financed by the World Bank or Asian Development Bank. The appeal was allowed, and the duty demand of Rs. 2,78,21,483/- was set aside. en-us Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:50:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54739 The Tribunal held that the appellants were not entitled to exemption under Notification No. 108/95-C.E. due to the proviso to Section 5A of the Central Excise Act. However, the duty was calculated as per Notification No. 84/97-Cus., resulting in nil duty for goods supplied to projects financed by the World Bank or Asian Development Bank. The appeal was allowed, and the duty demand of Rs. 2,78,21,483/- was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54739