<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1861 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472875</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act remains available because its bail restrictions do not impose an absolute bar. The Code of Criminal Procedure applies where consistent with the Act, and pre-arrest bail requires assessment of reasonable material and the likelihood of conviction without detailed evaluation of evidence. Where investigation has substantially progressed, relevant documents have been collected, the person has cooperated, and no real risk exists of absconding, influencing witnesses, tampering with evidence, or reoffending, custodial interrogation lacks sufficient justification. On these factors, the petitioner was entitled to anticipatory bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 19:10:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1861 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472875</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act remains available because its bail restrictions do not impose an absolute bar. The Code of Criminal Procedure applies where consistent with the Act, and pre-arrest bail requires assessment of reasonable material and the likelihood of conviction without detailed evaluation of evidence. Where investigation has substantially progressed, relevant documents have been collected, the person has cooperated, and no real risk exists of absconding, influencing witnesses, tampering with evidence, or reoffending, custodial interrogation lacks sufficient justification. On these factors, the petitioner was entitled to anticipatory bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>