<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1503 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472876</link>
    <description>Bank account freezing based on suspicious-transaction monitoring requires a transaction profile that objectively supports the suspicion. Banks, as custodians of customer accounts rather than enforcement agencies, must not question legitimate business transactions or impose arbitrary restrictions. RBI Know Your Customer Directions require monitoring of suspicious transactions but do not permit account freezes without proper basis. Prior notice, a show-cause opportunity and a personal hearing are necessary safeguards where freezing materially affects civil and commercial activity. Restrictions imposed without these safeguards may breach natural justice, fail proportionality review, and infringe constitutional business and personal-liberty rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 19:10:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1503 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472876</link>
      <description>Bank account freezing based on suspicious-transaction monitoring requires a transaction profile that objectively supports the suspicion. Banks, as custodians of customer accounts rather than enforcement agencies, must not question legitimate business transactions or impose arbitrary restrictions. RBI Know Your Customer Directions require monitoring of suspicious transactions but do not permit account freezes without proper basis. Prior notice, a show-cause opportunity and a personal hearing are necessary safeguards where freezing materially affects civil and commercial activity. Restrictions imposed without these safeguards may breach natural justice, fail proportionality review, and infringe constitutional business and personal-liberty rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>