<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1867 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472877</link>
    <description>Account freezes based on transactions exceeding a prescribed threshold and alleged KYC deficiencies require reassessment upon submission of supporting and KYC documentation. The account may be unfrozen if the documents are found satisfactory on verification. No final determination was made on the legality of the freeze; the matter was disposed of through directions for document submission, threshold reassessment, and consequential review of the freeze.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 19:10:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=932107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1867 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472877</link>
      <description>Account freezes based on transactions exceeding a prescribed threshold and alleged KYC deficiencies require reassessment upon submission of supporting and KYC documentation. The account may be unfrozen if the documents are found satisfactory on verification. No final determination was made on the legality of the freeze; the matter was disposed of through directions for document submission, threshold reassessment, and consequential review of the freeze.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>