<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 144 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54721</link>
    <description>Duty-free removal of inputs from a domestic tariff area unit to a 100% export-oriented unit under CT-3 documentation was treated as permissible where the recipient unit accounted for the goods and used them for authorised export production. The analysis notes that such transfer was considered substantively analogous to export without payment of duty, so denial of credit was not justified on the documented facts. As a result, the duty demand and equal penalty were set aside, and the impugned order was annulled in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:54:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 144 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54721</link>
      <description>Duty-free removal of inputs from a domestic tariff area unit to a 100% export-oriented unit under CT-3 documentation was treated as permissible where the recipient unit accounted for the goods and used them for authorised export production. The analysis notes that such transfer was considered substantively analogous to export without payment of duty, so denial of credit was not justified on the documented facts. As a result, the duty demand and equal penalty were set aside, and the impugned order was annulled in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>