<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 132 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54698</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order dismissing the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement, rejecting the application seeking a recall of the order. The Tribunal found no evidence of the appellant&#039;s financial inability to meet government dues, in line with the Supreme Court precedent. The decision was pronounced in open court, affirming the rejection based on the lack of demonstrated financial position justifying a recall of the dismissal order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 132 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54698</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order dismissing the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement, rejecting the application seeking a recall of the order. The Tribunal found no evidence of the appellant&#039;s financial inability to meet government dues, in line with the Supreme Court precedent. The decision was pronounced in open court, affirming the rejection based on the lack of demonstrated financial position justifying a recall of the dismissal order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>