<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1669 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801726</link>
    <description>Completion of the block assessment, absence of any outstanding tax demand, and absence of an operative attachment over the bank locker supported release of the jewellery. The assessee could operate the locker in accordance with the bank&#039;s procedure, while the Revenue&#039;s lack of objection and undertaking to release the jewellery enabled its handover to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=931724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1669 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801726</link>
      <description>Completion of the block assessment, absence of any outstanding tax demand, and absence of an operative attachment over the bank locker supported release of the jewellery. The assessee could operate the locker in accordance with the bank&#039;s procedure, while the Revenue&#039;s lack of objection and undertaking to release the jewellery enabled its handover to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>