<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rectification limits bar consequential assessment changes where advance-tax interest liability remains legally debatable or merged in appeal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105395</link>
    <description>Additional legal grounds raising pure questions of law may be admitted for the first time on appeal where all material facts are on record and no further inquiry is required. Rectification of a consequential assessment order must be confined to the mistake identified in the rectification notice and must arise from that order itself. Interest under section 234B, having merged with the appellate order, could not be rectified in the consequential order; any section 234C omission lay in the original assessment. Further, a debatable advance-tax interest levy under the statutory proviso is not a mistake apparent from record. The rectification and its appellate confirmation were invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:05:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=931693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rectification limits bar consequential assessment changes where advance-tax interest liability remains legally debatable or merged in appeal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105395</link>
      <description>Additional legal grounds raising pure questions of law may be admitted for the first time on appeal where all material facts are on record and no further inquiry is required. Rectification of a consequential assessment order must be confined to the mistake identified in the rectification notice and must arise from that order itself. Interest under section 234B, having merged with the appellate order, could not be rectified in the consequential order; any section 234C omission lay in the original assessment. Further, a debatable advance-tax interest levy under the statutory proviso is not a mistake apparent from record. The rectification and its appellate confirmation were invalid.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:05:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>