<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 189 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54681</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to the lack of initial duty paying documents but set aside penalties under Section 11AC and on the Director. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 25,000 based on the case&#039;s circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:20:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 189 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54681</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to the lack of initial duty paying documents but set aside penalties under Section 11AC and on the Director. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 25,000 based on the case&#039;s circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>