<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 177 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the fine of Rs. 1,99,000/- as the goods were not available for confiscation, upheld the penalty of Rs. 25,000/- under Section 112(a), and set aside the penalty of Rs. 59,882/- under Section 114A due to penalty already imposed under Section 112.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:04:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 177 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the fine of Rs. 1,99,000/- as the goods were not available for confiscation, upheld the penalty of Rs. 25,000/- under Section 112(a), and set aside the penalty of Rs. 59,882/- under Section 114A due to penalty already imposed under Section 112.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>