https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801564 Interim protection against suspension of operations was considered warranted pending a contemplated inquiry because a strong prima facie case for relief existed. The suspension appeared prima facie unjustified, and the prescribed timeline under Regulation 11(3) appeared not to have been followed. The appeal was admitted on substantial questions of law, with a stay on the suspension order and consequential public notice pending inquiry. The pending inquiry was directed to proceed without influence from the impugned appellate order. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Oct 2026 08:37:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801564 Interim protection against suspension of operations was considered warranted pending a contemplated inquiry because a strong prima facie case for relief existed. The suspension appeared prima facie unjustified, and the prescribed timeline under Regulation 11(3) appeared not to have been followed. The appeal was admitted on substantial questions of law, with a stay on the suspension order and consequential public notice pending inquiry. The pending inquiry was directed to proceed without influence from the impugned appellate order. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801564