<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 123 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54647</link>
    <description>Waste filter cake generated as an exhausted filter aid in the manufacture of chemical additives was treated as a waste product with negative commercial value, not a manufactured commodity. The record, including technical reports and prior factual findings, showed no evidence that it was sold or capable of being bought and sold in the form in which it emerged. The applicable excise principle was that mere sale does not itself establish marketability, and a residue or waste material is not excisable merely because it contains recoverable constituents. It was therefore held non-excisable and not classifiable for central excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:50:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 123 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54647</link>
      <description>Waste filter cake generated as an exhausted filter aid in the manufacture of chemical additives was treated as a waste product with negative commercial value, not a manufactured commodity. The record, including technical reports and prior factual findings, showed no evidence that it was sold or capable of being bought and sold in the form in which it emerged. The applicable excise principle was that mere sale does not itself establish marketability, and a residue or waste material is not excisable merely because it contains recoverable constituents. It was therefore held non-excisable and not classifiable for central excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>