<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Preferential-Issue Proceeds Must Follow Disclosed Objects; Later Ratification Cannot Cure Fraud or Unfair Trade Practices</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105308</link>
    <description>Shareholder ratification cannot retrospectively validate diversion of preferential-issue proceeds from the objects disclosed in the explanatory statement where the conduct breaches securities-market disclosure duties and constitutes fraud or an unfair trade practice. Issue-specific objects, rather than broad memorandum objects, govern whether proceeds were deployed as represented. Immediate use of funds for undisclosed loans or share investments, without a substantiated commercial explanation, may support an inference that the disclosed objects were never intended to be performed. Prospectus-based variation mechanisms do not apply to private placements or cure completed diversions. Continuing disclosure requirements promote transparency but do not authorise post-facto deviations, while later amendments to corporate objects remain prospective only.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 16:05:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 16:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=931237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Preferential-Issue Proceeds Must Follow Disclosed Objects; Later Ratification Cannot Cure Fraud or Unfair Trade Practices</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105308</link>
      <description>Shareholder ratification cannot retrospectively validate diversion of preferential-issue proceeds from the objects disclosed in the explanatory statement where the conduct breaches securities-market disclosure duties and constitutes fraud or an unfair trade practice. Issue-specific objects, rather than broad memorandum objects, govern whether proceeds were deployed as represented. Immediate use of funds for undisclosed loans or share investments, without a substantiated commercial explanation, may support an inference that the disclosed objects were never intended to be performed. Prospectus-based variation mechanisms do not apply to private placements or cure completed diversions. Continuing disclosure requirements promote transparency but do not authorise post-facto deviations, while later amendments to corporate objects remain prospective only.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 16:05:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>