<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 136 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54642</link>
    <description>Clearances from an independent job-worker&#039;s factory are not to be clubbed with the appellant&#039;s clearances for small scale industry exemption unless the assessee exercises supervision and control over the manufacture so that the other unit becomes a mere extension of the assessee. Mere supply of raw materials, brand specifications, or quality control is insufficient by itself to justify aggregation where the manufacturing unit remains independently operated under a contractual arrangement. On the stated facts, the independent unit&#039;s goods could not be treated as manufactured by the appellant, and the exemption entitlement had to be examined separately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:24:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 136 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54642</link>
      <description>Clearances from an independent job-worker&#039;s factory are not to be clubbed with the appellant&#039;s clearances for small scale industry exemption unless the assessee exercises supervision and control over the manufacture so that the other unit becomes a mere extension of the assessee. Mere supply of raw materials, brand specifications, or quality control is insufficient by itself to justify aggregation where the manufacturing unit remains independently operated under a contractual arrangement. On the stated facts, the independent unit&#039;s goods could not be treated as manufactured by the appellant, and the exemption entitlement had to be examined separately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>