<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 250 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54634</link>
    <description>Physician samples used as advertising material may be valued on a pro-rata basis by reference to the price of regular packs where that method reasonably reflects the relevant cost elements. In the context of samples manufactured partly on job work and partly by the assessee, the department&#039;s attempt to adopt a higher assessable value based on special packing cost was not accepted, because the pro-rata method produced a valuation higher than one based only on material cost plus job charges for job-work samples. The assessee&#039;s valuation method was therefore accepted as proper.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:10:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 250 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54634</link>
      <description>Physician samples used as advertising material may be valued on a pro-rata basis by reference to the price of regular packs where that method reasonably reflects the relevant cost elements. In the context of samples manufactured partly on job work and partly by the assessee, the department&#039;s attempt to adopt a higher assessable value based on special packing cost was not accepted, because the pro-rata method produced a valuation higher than one based only on material cost plus job charges for job-work samples. The assessee&#039;s valuation method was therefore accepted as proper.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>