<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1458 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801515</link>
    <description>Portal-based GST notice is a valid mode of service, but repeated non-response requires use of other available service methods, preferably registered post, to secure effective service. An ex parte assessment founded solely on formal portal uploads, without a personal hearing, denies an effective opportunity to respond and breaches natural justice. The resulting assessment and consequential order are unsustainable because effective service and a meaningful hearing were not provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 08:38:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=931092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1458 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801515</link>
      <description>Portal-based GST notice is a valid mode of service, but repeated non-response requires use of other available service methods, preferably registered post, to secure effective service. An ex parte assessment founded solely on formal portal uploads, without a personal hearing, denies an effective opportunity to respond and breaches natural justice. The resulting assessment and consequential order are unsustainable because effective service and a meaningful hearing were not provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>