https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472662 Section 26(2) of the Competition Act requires sufficient admissible and actionable material before a prima facie view of contravention can justify further inquiry. Electronic evidence must be supported by the required certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Where requested clarifications and that certificate remain unavailable despite repeated opportunities, the evidentiary threshold for proceeding is not met. en-us Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2026 18:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472662 Section 26(2) of the Competition Act requires sufficient admissible and actionable material before a prima facie view of contravention can justify further inquiry. Electronic evidence must be supported by the required certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Where requested clarifications and that certificate remain unavailable despite repeated opportunities, the evidentiary threshold for proceeding is not met. Case-Laws Law of Competition Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472662