https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801358 Admission of cheque execution triggers presumptions of consideration and legally enforceable liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act, rebuttable only through a consistent probable defence on a preponderance of probabilities. Inconsistent claims that a cheque was lost or stolen do not meet that standard. A dishonour marked "refer to drawer" may support cheque-dishonour liability, and crediting the cheque to an account connected with the payee's business can satisfy payee and presentment requirements where the nexus is established. Cash-loan contraventions under income-tax law do not, by themselves, render the underlying debt unenforceable. Revisional jurisdiction does not permit fresh appraisal of evidence absent perversity in concurrent findings. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801358 Admission of cheque execution triggers presumptions of consideration and legally enforceable liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act, rebuttable only through a consistent probable defence on a preponderance of probabilities. Inconsistent claims that a cheque was lost or stolen do not meet that standard. A dishonour marked "refer to drawer" may support cheque-dishonour liability, and crediting the cheque to an account connected with the payee's business can satisfy payee and presentment requirements where the nexus is established. Cash-loan contraventions under income-tax law do not, by themselves, render the underlying debt unenforceable. Revisional jurisdiction does not permit fresh appraisal of evidence absent perversity in concurrent findings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801358