https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801364 Scheduled predicate offences and material indicating transfer or layering of loan proceeds support a money-laundering investigation and the use of statutory summons to obtain evidence and documents. Pending challenges to the predicate FIR or investigation do not, by themselves, remove jurisdiction to investigate proceeds of crime. A proposed bank loan settlement or repayment does not independently terminate allegations involving fraud, forgery, or diversion of funds. Blanket protection from coercive action or arrest is not available through summons-quashing proceedings; anticipatory-bail relief must be sought through the competent court. Statutory investigation and compliance with summons may therefore continue. en-us Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2026 11:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801364 Scheduled predicate offences and material indicating transfer or layering of loan proceeds support a money-laundering investigation and the use of statutory summons to obtain evidence and documents. Pending challenges to the predicate FIR or investigation do not, by themselves, remove jurisdiction to investigate proceeds of crime. A proposed bank loan settlement or repayment does not independently terminate allegations involving fraud, forgery, or diversion of funds. Blanket protection from coercive action or arrest is not available through summons-quashing proceedings; anticipatory-bail relief must be sought through the competent court. Statutory investigation and compliance with summons may therefore continue. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801364