https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801367 Remand for a fresh reasoned decision permits reappreciation of an enlarged record but requires reasons for departing from previously relevant matters. Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, a Section 9 application cannot serve as a recovery mechanism for genuinely contested operational debt: the inquiry is whether a plausible dispute existed before the demand notice, not whether the defence is conclusively proved. Returned goods, contemporaneous complaints, supporting media and laboratory material may establish a quality dispute, while contested evidentiary weight, contractual stipulations and liability remain for appropriate proceedings. Implied merchantable quality need not depend on a written quality clause. A plausible pre-existing quality dispute prevents insolvency admission. en-us Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801367 Remand for a fresh reasoned decision permits reappreciation of an enlarged record but requires reasons for departing from previously relevant matters. Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, a Section 9 application cannot serve as a recovery mechanism for genuinely contested operational debt: the inquiry is whether a plausible dispute existed before the demand notice, not whether the defence is conclusively proved. Returned goods, contemporaneous complaints, supporting media and laboratory material may establish a quality dispute, while contested evidentiary weight, contractual stipulations and liability remain for appropriate proceedings. Implied merchantable quality need not depend on a written quality clause. A plausible pre-existing quality dispute prevents insolvency admission. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801367