<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1312 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801369</link>
    <description>Tender bidders whose participation rights or accepted bids are displaced by cancellation and revival of an expired earlier contract have standing to challenge the revival. A former contractor that voluntarily participates in an unchallenged replacement tender acquiesces in that process and waives any claim to continued performance under the original contract. Orders made during insolvency and an approved resolution plan do not extend an expired works contract; statutory protection for specified governmental grants does not require contractual renewal. Reviving the contract at original rates without transparent competition after a substantial lapse is arbitrary and contrary to public interest. Remaining works must be awarded through a transparent competitive process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1312 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801369</link>
      <description>Tender bidders whose participation rights or accepted bids are displaced by cancellation and revival of an expired earlier contract have standing to challenge the revival. A former contractor that voluntarily participates in an unchallenged replacement tender acquiesces in that process and waives any claim to continued performance under the original contract. Orders made during insolvency and an approved resolution plan do not extend an expired works contract; statutory protection for specified governmental grants does not require contractual renewal. Reviving the contract at original rates without transparent competition after a substantial lapse is arbitrary and contrary to public interest. Remaining works must be awarded through a transparent competitive process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>