<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1357 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801414</link>
    <description>Section 260A permits an appeal only on substantial questions arising from the ITAT order under challenge. Questions concerning deduction for product development expenditure related to a separate assessee appeal, for which the Revenue had filed an independent appeal, rather than the challenged Revenue appeal. They therefore could not be advanced as substantial questions in the present appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1357 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801414</link>
      <description>Section 260A permits an appeal only on substantial questions arising from the ITAT order under challenge. Questions concerning deduction for product development expenditure related to a separate assessee appeal, for which the Revenue had filed an independent appeal, rather than the challenged Revenue appeal. They therefore could not be advanced as substantial questions in the present appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>